Comprehensive Collection of Writings on the 2024 Election and Key Issues [Updated]

As the 2024 election approaches, a plethora of writings emerges from the Volokh Conspiracy blog, hosted by Reason, examining various aspects of the electoral landscape and the candidates involved. The content is organized in reverse chronological order, culminating with pieces that delve deep into political ignorance as a significant issue affecting voter behavior. The article “Political Ignorance is an Even Worse Problem than I Thought,” published on November 3, outlines how the election has amplified concerns around political ignorance, suggesting that the public’s lack of understanding regarding candidates’ policies presents a more considerable danger than initially recognized.

Moreover, in “Kamala Harris is a Far Lesser Evil than Donald Trump,” featured on October 24, the argument emerges that voting for Harris, despite her flaws, may be a more favorable choice than supporting Trump. This piece is supported by libertarian critiques highlighting Trump’s policies, such as those presented by Matt Zwolinski, who emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of choosing between the two candidates. In tandem, other articles critique Trump’s immigration strategies, focusing on the economic and social consequences of his mass deportation proposals, and draw attention to how such strategies could potentially escape scrutiny from the courts.

Exploring broader presidential powers, particularly regarding tariffs and immigration, is crucial for contextualizing Trump’s possible policy moves. In “Perils of Broad Presidential Power Over Tariffs,” published on October 10, it is asserted that Trump could implement his tariff plans without new legislation, raising questions about executive overreach. On the immigration front, the discussion extends to the implications of using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 for mass deportations, reminding readers of the historical context and risks that accompany such policies. Contrastingly, Harris’s revised immigration proposals are presented as slightly less harmful, though still problematic.

Another critical examination appears in pieces focused on the housing policies put forth by both candidates. Articles like “Harris and Trump Offer Terrible Housing Policies” and “Biden’s Badly Flawed New Housing Plan” argue that both candidates fail to address the core issues affecting the housing market effectively. The critique extends to their overarching economic philosophies, with discussions surrounding the societal implications of such policies being necessary for informed voting. By addressing the failures of both campaigns regarding housing, voters are encouraged to consider the broader consequences of supporting either candidate.

Interwoven throughout these discussions is a narrative about political framing and its consequences on public perception. The article on J.D. Vance and taxing childless individuals emphasizes how language can shape attitudes toward taxation and public policy. This theme of distortion due to “political ignorance” appears consistently, coupled with investigations into how voter behavior is influenced by misunderstanding or misrepresenting issues like inflation and economic health, which have a substantial impact on voter decisions.

Finally, the overarching theme reiterates the complexity of voter choice in the current political climate. The examination of lesser evil voting highlights the ethical considerations voters grapple with when selecting candidates amidst competing ideologies. The articles compel readers to reflect critically on their choices, emphasizing the need for a more engaged and informed electorate to navigate the challenges posed by candidates who may perpetuate ignorance while advancing their agendas. As Election Day nears, these writings collectively push for an essential conversation around the politics of understanding, misrepresentation, and the implications of public ignorance in shaping the future of the nation.