The Influx of Takedown Requests Continues
This intricate saga revolves around persistent attempts to suppress online information related to a legal dispute between Kelly Hyman, a lawyer and media commentator, and her father, Alex Daoud, a disgraced former Miami Beach mayor. The core of the conflict lies in the case Hyman v. Daoud, a lawsuit stemming from a real estate transaction. Over several years, concerted efforts have been made to erase various online materials pertaining to this case, including news articles covering the dispute. These attempts have involved deindexing requests submitted to Google, leveraging court orders, and even direct contact with news organizations.
The narrative unfolds with a series of deindexing requests aimed at removing articles from Google’s search results. Two specific requests, filed in December 2020, are of particular interest. These requests cited a March 13, 2024 court order as justification for removing a combined total of 50 articles, including pieces from prominent news outlets like the Miami Herald and CBS News, as well as several articles written by the author of this account. Crucially, the deindexing requests failed to disclose a subsequent October 28, 2024 court order that significantly vacated the earlier order, limiting its scope to only apply to Daoud himself. This omission misrepresented the legal basis for the deindexing requests, attempting to leverage a largely invalidated order.
The author, who has been actively reporting on this ongoing saga, has found themselves repeatedly targeted in these suppression efforts. Multiple articles they wrote covering the Hyman v. Daoud case, as well as the attempts to suppress information about it, have been specifically listed in deindexing requests. These requests, aiming to erase the author’s work from online visibility, have ultimately proven unsuccessful. Google, seemingly recognizing the flawed legal basis and potential censorship implications, has not acted upon them. Ironically, these attempts to suppress information have only served to generate more coverage of the issue, further amplifying the story rather than silencing it.
A key point of contention is the use of a partially vacated court order to justify the deindexing requests. The March 13, 2024 order, while initially broad in its scope, was later substantially narrowed by the October 28, 2024 order. By failing to disclose the later order, the deindexing requests presented a misleading picture of the legal landscape. This suggests a deliberate attempt to exploit a technicality and potentially deceive Google into removing content that was no longer subject to the original court order. The attempt to leverage a partially vacated order raises questions about the ethics and motivations behind the ongoing censorship efforts.
The attempts to suppress online information extend beyond the author’s work and include articles from established news organizations. The inclusion of articles from the Miami Herald, CBS News, and other reputable sources underscores the broad scope of these censorship efforts. It suggests a desire to control the narrative surrounding the Hyman v. Daoud case by limiting public access to information about it, regardless of the source. This raises concerns about potential abuse of legal processes and the chilling effect such actions can have on journalistic reporting.
In conclusion, the persistent efforts to suppress online information related to the Hyman v. Daoud case paint a complex picture of legal maneuvering and information control. The use of deindexing requests, the omission of crucial legal developments, and the targeting of both independent bloggers and established news organizations highlight the lengths to which some parties are willing to go to manage public perception. This ongoing saga not only underscores the challenges of maintaining online transparency but also raises critical questions about the ethical implications of using legal processes to suppress information in the digital age. The author’s continued reporting, despite being a target of these suppression attempts, illuminates the importance of a free press and the ongoing struggle to protect access to information in an increasingly interconnected world.
Share this content:
Post Comment