Traffic Conviction Records: Basseterre Magistrate’s Court

The Basseterre Magistrate Court, under the jurisdiction of Her Honor Ms. Sherry-Ann Liburd-Charles, witnessed a series of traffic violation cases on January 30, 2025. Several individuals appeared before the court, facing charges ranging from driving without proper documentation to driving without due care and attention. The court proceedings resulted in a combination of fines, imprisonment sentences (suspended upon timely payment of fines), and cautions, reflecting the varying severity of the infractions and possibly the individual circumstances of the offenders. The cases underscore the importance of adhering to traffic regulations to ensure road safety and maintain order within the community.

Elvesia Glasgow of St. Paul’s faced multiple charges, highlighting a disregard for multiple aspects of responsible driving. She was fined a total of $1500 for operating a vehicle without a valid driver’s license and without insurance, reflecting the seriousness of these offenses. These lapses expose not only the driver but also other road users to significant risk. The court also convicted and cautioned Glasgow for driving without due care and attention, suggesting a pattern of negligent behavior behind the wheel. The combined penalties aim to deter future violations and emphasize the importance of responsible driving practices.

Chadena Nisbett of Stapleton Village and several other individuals, including Yoel Gonzalez Romero, Suresh Sunder, Delroy Stevens, and Carlton Daniel, were also brought before the court for driving without due care and attention. This common offense points to a prevalent issue of negligent driving within the community. The fines levied against these individuals varied based on the specifics of their cases, ranging from $750 to $2000, with corresponding imprisonment terms imposed should the fines not be paid within the stipulated timeframes. This graduated penalty system likely reflects the varying degrees of negligence exhibited in each case, as well as any previous driving infractions on the individual’s record.

Yoel Gonzalez Romero of Newtown faced a litany of charges, including driving while using a mobile phone, failing to produce a driver’s license immediately, and two separate counts of driving without due care and attention. The multiple charges suggest a blatant disregard for traffic regulations and safe driving practices. While he received cautions for using a mobile phone and failing to produce a license, the combined fines for the two instances of driving without due care and attention totaled $2500, reflecting the seriousness of repeated negligent driving.

Suresh Sunder of Pond Site faced charges not only for driving without due care and attention but also for the use of indecent language, which adds another layer of concern regarding public order. While the fine for the driving offense was $2000, the additional fine of $1500 for indecent language underscores the court’s commitment to upholding standards of public decency and decorum. This additional charge suggests that the incident may have involved other road users or law enforcement officers, making the behavior not just a traffic violation but a breach of public peace.

The court’s handling of these cases – including not just fines and potential imprisonment, but also cautions – indicates a multi-pronged approach to addressing traffic violations. Cautions serve as a formal warning, placing individuals on notice that further violations will likely result in more severe consequences. The range of penalties also suggests that the court considers the specific circumstances of each case, including the severity of the offense, the defendant’s history, and their potential for rehabilitation. Beyond the individual cases, the court’s actions serve as a broader reminder to the community about the importance of traffic safety and responsible driving.

In addition to the individual cases detailed above, the court also processed a significant volume of other traffic-related matters. The withdrawal of 36 ticket cases upon proof of payment demonstrates the efficiency of the system in processing less serious offenses, allowing individuals to resolve their matters quickly and efficiently by paying the designated fines. The adjournment of five matters to future dates likely reflects more complex cases requiring further investigation, the gathering of additional evidence, or the resolution of scheduling conflicts. These administrative actions further demonstrate the court’s commitment to ensuring that all traffic violations are addressed appropriately and efficiently.